Rethinking Criminal Justice—Why Black Prosecutors Matter

Rethinking Criminal Justice—Why Black Prosecutors Matter

Story tools


A A AResize


Share and Email

WASHINGTON, D.C.—Nearly three weeks after the midterm elections, the winner of the hard-fought race to become California’s next attorney general has not been determined. Kamala Harris, the San Francisco district attorney, holds a razor-thin lead over Steve Cooley, her Los Angeles County counterpart, with some 680,000 votes remaining to be counted.

While the stakes are highest for California residents, the AG race is also being watched closely in legal circles nationwide, especially by people concerned about criminal justic policies and practices that have a harmful affect on communities of color. They support Harris’ efforts to address these issues.

As San Francisco’s chief prosecutor, Harris is among a current crop of elected black DAs who are transforming the way crime is addressed, suspects are prosecuted, and punishment is meted out. Her innovative approaches for being “Smart on Crime,” instead of simply “tough on crime” are have gained political currency for being thoughtful and pragmatic and are being borrowed by DAs around the country, particularly those in communities with large black, Latino or other minority populations.

Underlying Harris’ “smart” philosophy is a commitment to “preserving civil rights and ending cycles of repeat offenses,” which she expounds on in her 2009 book Smart on Crime. If she becomes California’s chief prosecutor, she could apply those innovations statewide and potentially turn the state into a national model for crime-fighting through novel prosecutorial practices. If she loses, she’s likely to have lasting influence nonetheless.

“One of the fundamental requirements in building a fair and just criminal justice system is ensuring that, from top to bottom, that system is representative of the communities it is mandated to protect,” Harris says in an e-mail statement. “I am proud to be in this new and growing group of African-American district attorneys. But as my mother always told me, while it’s an honor to be the first, it’s more important to make sure you’re not the last.

“For me, that means building a legacy around the adoption of smart criminal justice policy that focuses on back-end enforcement with strict accountability and swift consequences for serious and violent offenders, and crime prevention and early intervention on the front end.”

Addressing Racial Disparities

Harris, Craig Watkins of Dallas County, Texas, and Seth Williams of Philadelphia form a triumvirate of popular black DAs who work in large urban areas and have made headlines for their efforts to be more responsive to communities they serve and to address racial disparities in the legal system. Civil rights groups and others have long blamed these disparities for the disproportionate incarceration of people of color.

Though they are among the most visible, they are not the only black DAs taking innovative approaches to prosecuting crimes. David Soares, the district attorney of Albany County, N.Y., is often cited.

The ideas they are promoting are being taken up by some white prosecutors as well. For example, in Milwaukee County, Wisconsin, DA John Chisholm’s office conducted extensive data analysis to identify whether some of its charging decisions had a racially disparate impact.

In the 2007 study, Chisholm collaborated closely with the Vera Institute of Justice, a nonpartisan research center that works with local, state and national officials to improve justice system policies and practices. When charges for possession of drug paraphernalia were analyzed, they found that black defendants were being charged, while whites were diverted to alternatives such as drug treatment programs. So Chisholm changed policy to require that prosecutors obtain prior approval before charging defendants with possession of drug paraphernalia instead of allowing them to participate in an alternative program.

Watkins’s Innocence Project

Still, Harris, Watkins, and Williams get much of the attention for their creativity in addressing high recidivism rates and charging and sentencing practices that historically punished minority defendants more harshly than white defendants.

Watkins has been lauded for his Conviction Integrity Unit, which has reviewed more than 400 convictions involving DNA evidence and discovered more than a dozen wrongful convictions. This approach is in stark contrast to that of many other Texas DAs as well as his own predecessors in Dallas.

The trio readily admits borrowing ideas from each other and from best practices elsewhere nationwide, and Williams and Watkins cite Harris as a role model. Like her, they have focused on the shortage of reentry programs that provide job training and socialization skills for inmates leaving prisons, intending to keep them from returning.

“They and other DAs are taking a more thoughtful approach to justice policies,” says Seema Gajwani, program officer for criminal and juvenile justice at the Washington, D.C.–based Public Welfare Foundation. “They’re interested in more thoughtful views of their role in the criminal justice system. Most district attorneys evaluate themselves on rates of convictions and lengths of sentences, but some of the newer prosecutors, especially those in urban areas, are thinking about the role of the prosecutor in pubic safety.”

It’s too early to tell whether these DAs’ actions are having a significant impact on prosecution rates, death penalty cases, sentencing guidelines and other legal processes that tend to be more punitive toward black and Hispanic defendants. But supporters say that over the long term, the new projects could become influential national models. In the interim, the DAs are making a difference in their jurisdictions.

“What it does demonstrate is the impact their voices and deeds can add to changing the dialogue that being tough on crime is certainly not as effective as being smart on crime,” says Wayne McKenzie, director of Vera’s Prosecution and Racial Justice Project. “While the former has contributed to making us the greatest incarcerator of our citizens in the world and to growing racial disparities, it’s the latter philosophy that will ultimately lead to improving public safety and addressing racial disparities.”

McKenzie, a former Brooklyn prosecutor and past president of the National Black Prosecutors Association (NBPA), says diversifying and increasing the ranks of prosecutors of color, particularly in supervisory positions that carry greater discretionary power, will have a more significant impact on fighting disparities and promoting equal justice than election of state AGs of color.

While the numbers of black DAs and AGs nationwide remains relatively small—about 40, according to the NBPA, not including U.S. attorneys who are White House appointees and work for the federal government, or staff prosecutors at the local, state, and federal levels—McKenzie says they can still have a significant impact.

“They’re demonstrating that with their actions right now,” he says, citing Watkins’ Integrity Control Unit, which is spawning similar projects in other DA’s offices, and Seth Williams’ use of data to influence evidence-based policy and decision making. “It’s all having benefits way beyond just looking at racial disparities.”

Harris, Watkins, Williams and others have acted with an eye toward reducing crime and increasing safety in communities from which lawbreakers come and to which they often return after release. They also work toward building trust and cooperation with communities that often feel abused and disrespected by district attorneys’ offices.

They support alternatives to incarceration for first-time, nonviolent offenders. These include drug treatment intervention programs that help defendants become clean, give them job training, require community service and, after successful completion of the program, remove charges from their records so they will be more likely to find jobs and less likely to continue criminal behavior.

Phillie’s Community-Based Prosecutions

Williams, for instance, uses a community-based prosecution model that assigns prosecutors to specific geographic areas so they can get to know community groups, clergy members, business associations and town watch groups, and track crime patterns geographically. The prosecutors also manage the same cases from start to finish.

“What we’re trying to do here is engage the public,” Williams says. “In a lot of communities, people do not see prosecutors as protectors of the community. They see them as oppressors of the community.” He wants Philadelphia residents to believe that his office is fair across the board, prosecuting people guilty of crimes “and that we’ll have the same standards of justice in every corner of Philadelphia no matter who your father was or what last name you have.”

Williams also created a repeat offender unit and is replicating Harris’ “Back on Track Initiative,” which defers sentences for first-time, nonviolent drug offenders who complete a court-supervised “intensive personal responsibility program.” The program includes job training, education, drug treatment and other services.

Williams says he has raised $1 million in private donations to start a Philadelphia version of the program, which he is calling “The Choice Is Yours.” He says the program will reduce recidivism rates by addressing illiteracy, addiction, lack of a high school diploma and mental or other underlying problems that may have contributed to criminal behavior.

Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger last year signed a bill authorizing counties around California to establish their own Back on Track programs.

In July, the Public Welfare Foundation highlighted national attention and political currency being given to DAs’ innovative ideas by awarding a $165,000 grant to the Association of Prosecuting Attorneys to support an increase in “the participation of prosecuting attorneys in progressive criminal justice reform.

 Civil rights groups are watching developments closely but remain unconvinced that these initiatives indicate an actual trend among traditional district attorneys’ offices, not just the isolated work of a few well-intentioned outliers.

“For many years, communities of color have been frustrated by the apparent willingness of prosecutors to turn a blind eye to the ways in which their exercise of discretion causes unjust racial disparities in charging and sentencing, improper systematic exclusion of African Americans and Latinos from service on criminal juries, and unconscionable wrongful convictions,” says Christina Swarns, director of the Criminal Justice Project of the NAACP Legal Defense & Educational Fund.

“These prosecutor offices that submit to legitimate and comprehensive analyses of the ways in which their policies do—and do not—effect equal justice and/or implement policies and procedures designed to ensure the fairness and transparency of its decision making process are taking a significant first step towards restoring community trust in law enforcement.”




Posted Nov 22 2010

To whom it may concern 11-18-10
From buddy lee George 
12016 gladhill ave
La mirada ca 90638-1505
Trial ended 8-15-09 the verdict

Enclosed in this letter is information
Regarding a wrongful conviction on
Case# VA107160
The trial was held at Norwalk superior
Court located in Norwalk California 
The Honorable judge Roger Ito division S
Listed below is reasons why and enclosed in this writing is evidence Were all the evidence in my case had been destroyed 3 to 5 months before the trial it's a email from the detective to the district attorney in my case disclosing the date evidence was destroyed 3 to 5  months before the trial
1.) my due process rights were violated
2.) I supoened 5 officers only one showed up and that was detective hakala out of Whittier police department he was the lead detective and the expert witness 
3.)their was bias involved with the processing of evidence because he used his own lab were the evidence had also been destroyed 3 to 5 months before the trial. 
4.) the detective stated during the trial 
He removed the drugs before the pre search video because he had a dog their was no dog
5.) right before the trial there was a conflict of interest with the attorneys that were representing me they violated attorney client privilege by having a meeting with the city of la mirada with out my permission nor knowledge were my case was discussed
6.) the attorneys name was Henry salcido out of long beach
7.) Henry salcido had two retired district attorneys working for him that were overfimilararity with detectives involved in my case 
8.) these attorneys told me they don't care if I'm innocent or guilty and that I should take a deal under the condition
I move out of la mirada when I get out
9.) Henry salcido told me if I gave home 180.000 and sign over the deed to our home he said he is best friends with steve cooley he could also make this case disappear 
10.) when the trial started the attorney I hired Joanne alberry out of riverside dident have enough time to familiarize her self with the case
11.) district attorney kang the Los Angeles county district attorney had me charged with prison priors and strikes I dident have and it was not until after the verdict did she admit her mistakes  email below is evidence of 
Were the evidence was destroyed
12.) I was charged with possession for sales when no drugs were found in my possession and no money was recovered 
13.) cruel and unusual punishment
14.) violation of my due process rights
15.) negligence 
16.) malpractice 
17.) wrongful conviction
18.) misrepresentation  
Please consider looking into this thanks
Respectfully submitted 
Buddy George 
19.) the first search warrant was denied whittier narcotics came in any way
20.) the 2nd search warrant was done with the name of Walter Eugene Farris 
A guy who has never stepped foot in our home  

Buddy George - VA107160From: joanne alberry
View Contact To: LAURIE YTARTE -----------------
-- Laurie,here is the email from the Detective 
telling the court that all the property was
destroyed. Sorry about all of it. Feel free to mail
me any payments you can at my office address
4229 Main St Suite 4 Riverside CA 92501 I will
let you know when I find an attorney who will
take on a governemtn entity. good luck to you
and Buddy,Joanne ---------- Forwarded message
----------From: Date: Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 7:23
AMSubject: Fw: Buddy George - VA107160To: Hi Joanne, Per our
conversation, here is the email from Detective
Hakala confirming that the evidence was
destroyed. I will request that our matter be taken
off calendar today. Thanks. ----------------------
Forwarded by Miriam Kang/DAUsers/NLADA on
09/25/2009 07:22 AM --------------------------- To:
cc: Subject: RE: Buddy George - VA107160 I
contacted our central property and the items
seized in the Buddy George case (408-15814-
0460-184) were dispoed on 05-29-09. Any other
questions just let me know. Eric ---------------------
[]Sent: Thu
9/24/2009 2:49 PMTo: Hakala, Eric J.Subject:
Buddy George - VA107160 Hi Detective Hakala,
Just as a reminder, please email me a letter
confirming that the the property booked into
evidence for this case has been disposed of and
the date of disposal. Thanks so much!
Sincerely,Miriam KangDeputy District
AttorneyTel: 562-807-7211 

Disclaimer: Comments do not necessarily reflect the views of New America Media. NAM reserves the right to edit or delete comments. Once published, comments are visible to search engines and will remain in their archives. If you do not want your identity connected to comments on this site, please refrain from commenting or use a handle or alias instead of your real name.