Obama’s Tax Deal Could Jeopardize Social Security

Obama’s Tax Deal Could Jeopardize Social Security

Story tools

Comments

A A AResize

Print

Share and Email

 
Democratic supporters of President Barack Obama’s tax bargain with Republicans—even those who are holding their noses—point to the many benefits for middle-class, low-income, and jobless Americans. One provision in particular seems to promise the happy crinkle of wrapping paper under the tree: the one-year tax “holiday” on Social Security deductions.

But, like so many gifts Americans hand out at this time of year, this is one we cannot afford. As many policy experts warn, the payroll tax holiday is more of a tax happy hour that would come at a huge cost—and undermine the very basis of Social Security.

Obama’s deal would knock 2 percentage points off the payroll contributions of the country’s 155 million workers in 2011, from 6.2 percent to 4.2 percent. Employers would continue to pay their full share of 6.2 percent of workers’ wages.

For the one-year reduction, the deal calls for the federal government to deposit the total amount of what should have been collected, about $120 billion, into the Social Security Trust Fund, so the tax holiday doesn’t add to the program’s long-term deficit.

Obama says the tax holiday will enable the average worker to hang on to $1,000 for the year.

But the plan worries leading progressive experts such as Nancy Altman, codirector of Social Security Works and author of The Battle for Social Security. Altman said the tax holiday is not only “dangerous.”

The 2 percent payroll-tax cut would give millionaires $2,236—hardly enough to make a difference in their spending. Meanwhile, the average worker earning $40,000—who really does need the money—would get only about $800, Altman said.

The typical African-American employee would see less than $700 spread over the year, while the typical Latino or Native American would have only an extra $600 or so to spend. for

Even though the government would repay Social Security the $120 billion is lost tax receipts, Altman and many other experts and members of Congress— including some Republicans— say the GOP is likely to try making the 2 percentage-point cut permanent.

Going into the 2012 presidential election, expect GOP leaders to argue that ending the tax holiday will amount to a tax increase, just as they’ve fought to make the Bush tax cuts permanent, despite the earlier deal to end it next year.

If they succeed—at a time when Republican power is again on the rise—Altman and others say Social Security will become politicized as never before. GOP leaders will fight against continuing to pay the difference back to Social Security out of general tax funds.

That, said Altman—who is regarded by some as a possible commissioner of Social Security one day—would double the program’s long-term funding shortage, an amount that is currently manageable but would be more daunting without its full funding from workers’ payroll contributions.

Were that to happen, she said, GOP leaders would realize a “self-fulfilling prophecy” and claim the program, which is now fairly easy to fix, is unsustainable.

The 2-point reduction— almost one-third of the payroll tax—would double the long-term funding shortage now projected for Social Security to cover all of its obligations to Americans to 75 years CLARIFY. In doing so, it would also fulfill the conservative prophecy that the program cannot pay for itself and should be narrowed to only help people in need.

When President Franklin Delano Roosevelt launched Social Security in 1935, he explained that as a universal entitlement, the program would have the support of Americans across the board. Support remains very high for the program, because people at every income level contribute and benefit. That has kept the political wolves at bay.

Sidebar: OBAMA'S BETTER PLAN

Given the risk of undermining the single greatest anti-poverty program accomplished by his Democratic party, a program that helped secure and build the great American middle class, what’s a poor president to do in the face of GOP poker players?

Actually, there’s a good alternative to the payroll tax cut, one that’s now in place but would have to be extended. It’s called the Making Work Pay Tax Credit. Part of the previous economic stimulus package, it was created by none other than President Obama.

Making Work Pay gives lower-income workers up to $400 a year to offset their payroll-tax contributions. That amount could be increased, and the upper limit means that wealthy people would not be able to pocket the lion’s share of savings.

Analysis by the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities shows that extending this tax credit would be better, more targeted economic stimulus than the payroll-tax holiday. That’s because almost all of the tax credit would go to people who are likely to pump the money right back into the economy through purchases of groceries, kids’ clothing, home repairs and so on.

In fact, U.S. Representatives Ted Deutch of Florida and Earl Pomeroy of North Dakota, both Democrats, are drumming up congressional support to replace the payroll-tax holiday with a middle-class tax cut, such as Making Work Pay, in any House proposal.

This past Friday, the Congressional Black Caucus issued a consensus statement opposing the extension of tax cuts for the wealthy. Saying that CBC is an “an ideologically diverse Caucus,” the statement also noted the group’s support for a “payroll-tax holiday or equivalent payment, such as a tax rebate check, with guarantees that Social Security will not be deprived of revenue.”

Progressive critics of the payroll-tax holiday also say that by boosting workers’ paychecks directly through the progressive income-tax system via Making Pay Work, the White House could avoid adding public confusion about the current structure of Social Security as a locked-in insurance program— one entirely funded by Americans through their paychecks.

Presumably, the White House hit a Republican stonewall with Making Work Pay or some other, more progressive options. But why give up without vigorous public debate that might delay a deal for a while but put the onus on conservatives while preserving the democratic basis of the Democratic Party?

The hard issue is that in making such tax deals— which echo some bad bargains that the White House made to get corporate backing for health care reform— Obama isn’t merely jeopardizing his own presidential future. He is failing to fulfill his promise of “hope”—the hope that he could move politics from the short-term bargaining of Beltway budgeters to a genuine re-examination of national priorities, such as stabilizing our income and health security for all families and communities.

Sure, everyone knows he’d lose some, but, as happened with Democratic candidates who stood their liberal ground in November’s election, he’d also win a few—and keep a lot of hopeful and energized voters in his corner.

--Paul Kleyman

 

Comments

 
Anonymous

Posted Dec 13 2010

Read the Fall of the Roman Empire! The rich will control everything, and goodbye to Social Security! The American People get just what they deserve. It is all being taken awawy without a fight.

Anonymous

Posted Dec 13 2010

I didn't know about the Making Work Pay program. That eliminates the last tenuous thread of rationality for support of the Republibama tax bill by any decent person.

Anonymous

Posted Dec 13 2010

Here is a letter to the editor of the Boston Globe, appearing December 11th, that supports your excellent article.

Anonymous

Posted Dec 13 2010

yes i heard that all people that was on ssi and ssa will get a check this year for 250.00 dollers i would like to know if that is so

Anonymous

Posted Dec 13 2010

Excellent analysis, with good quotes from scholars of Social Security and an alternative way to create a stimulus that doesn't hurt Social Security.
Margaret M. Gullette, Newton MA

Anonymous

Posted Dec 13 2010

Payroll Tax Holiday HAH! This is the beginning of the end of our Social Security Program and our president is allowing it to happen. This is an infamous day for the majority of Americans. What will happen to old people who can no longer work and have not been able to set aside money for retirement - people who are working 2 or 3 minimum wage jobs just to get by? Does the government have a solution for this problem? Or is it turning a blind eye. Sorry about that!

Anonymous

Posted Dec 15 2010

Terrible article. Why don't people just write checks to people that don't work? Better yet, take my ATM card and take whatever you want.

Anonymous

Posted Dec 15 2010

Terrible article. Why don't people just write checks to people that don't work? Better yet, take my ATM card and take whatever you want.

Anonymous

Posted Jan 31 2011

barocka obama it would help social security a hole l lot if congress would stop taking money out of the social security fund to cover the medicade program and cut most of the medicade program out just have social security and medicare only make medicare full benefit stop the copayment and all the medications we need give the ones that were on ssi that are really sick a social security check like the seniors disabled get just have social security only cut the medicade bill out wastful spending

Anonymous

Posted Mar 1 2011

barocka obama i love the work you are doing the best you can you are trying to save our social security i am prying that you get a contamise by this friday where we want have a goverment shut down our seniors disabled on social security social security disabelity have worked to hard for there money to disaper i am for one have worked three jobs at one time for three years stright and still work a part time seasonable job with my income i have ostil arthoritas plus ostel perilious in my spine i still work i cant do heavy work just lite work my arthuritas want let me anymore we sure could use another 250.00 rebate or a raise it is about time

Mason Iulo

Posted Oct 19 2011

Unions shouldnt be bigger then the single company they represent and all voting should be secret. Hiring and firing should be at the discretion of the employee only, the union can only suggest or quit in mass.

Disclaimer: Comments do not necessarily reflect the views of New America Media. NAM reserves the right to edit or delete comments. Once published, comments are visible to search engines and will remain in their archives. If you do not want your identity connected to comments on this site, please refrain from commenting or use a handle or alias instead of your real name.