La Opinión Calls for Two Latino Voting Districts in LA County
Two Latino districts.The struggle to create a second Latino-opportunity district in the Los Angeles County Board of Supervisors will reach a key stage today, when the five supervisors will once again consider the options on the table.
For now, their positions appear inflexible, with three supervisors supporting a redistricting plan maintaining the status quo.
The other two—Gloria Molina and Mark Ridley Thomas—seek a change that creates a second district where the Latino population has enough voting power to elect a representative.
There are several political considerations in selecting one of the maps, with the goal of updating political representation in the powerful Board of Supervisors based on the most recent Census data.
If the supervisors do not take into account the growth of the county’s Latino population and the fact, argued by redistricting experts, that there are enough Latino voters concentrated in certain areas of the county to have voting power in two districts, the case may end up in court, as happened in 1991.
The expense of defending a lawsuit could reach up to $20 million, and this is certainly not a good moment for this kind of expense in Los Angeles County.
Besides all this, there is a powerful constitutional argument for developing a plan or map that allows the creation of a second district with a cohesive group of Latino voters that can elect a candidate of their preference.
What the map that until now has been favored by the majority does is "pack" Latino voters into Gloria Molina’s district and divide them among the other districts, particularly in San Fernando Valley.
We think the most appropriate thing to do is try to avoid a costly legal battle and choose a map that fulfills the legal requirements of the Voting Rights Act, creating two Latino districts in a county where Latinos account for 48% of the population and 30% of registered voters.
Otherwise, supervisors will be repeating an expensive and useless error, similar to the one in 1991.
Supervisors should comply with the law and create a second Latino district
Disclaimer: Comments do not necessarily reflect the views of New America Media. NAM reserves the right to edit or delete comments. Once published, comments are visible to search engines and will remain in their archives. If you do not want your identity connected to comments on this site, please refrain from commenting or use a handle or alias instead of your real name.
Related Articles
Black, Latino Voter Registration Drops
New data from the U.S. Census Bureau reveals a decline in African American and Hispanic…
La Opinión Looks Back at Rodney King Riots
LOS ANGELES -- Twenty years after the Rodney King riots, Los Angeles Spanish-language newspaper La…
Immigration Isn't Everything: The Latino Vote Will Not Be Blindly Cast
CHICAGO -- As Latinos are projected to make up nearly nine percent of the electorate…
Poll: GOP Hopefuls Losing Ground to Obama Among Latinos
NEW YORK – Despite growing disappointment in his handling of immigration issues, Latino voters favor…
Latinos Missing From L.A. Redistricting Process
The participation of the Los Angeles Latino community in the process of redistricting has been…
Vast Majority of Latino Voters are Pro-Conservationist, Poll Finds
En EspañolA new poll shows that Latino voters in six inland western states have strong…

Comments