La Opinión: Yes to "Buffett Tax"
Editors of La Opinión write that the United States must change the way it manages its economic policy.
LOS ANGELES -- With the national unemployment rate at 9 percent and 46 million poor—one out of every six Americans or 15 percent, the highest percentage among industrialized countries—the United States must change the way it manages its economic policy. All of history’s great recessions have been overcome with deficit spending to create jobs. This one won’t be any different. Although the strategy does not seem to be working, consider this: A majority of economists said from the beginning that not only was there a need for a larger stimulus, but it was necessary to reform the tax code and ask millionaires and billionaires to contribute more.
President Obama presented a proposal addressing this, insisting people who make more than $1 million per year must pay the same tax rate as everyone else. Cries of "class warfare" are already being heard from populists who should be advocating for measures that benefit the country. In reality, they are defending the interests of the 1 percent of Americans who in the last 30 years have gone from owning 10 percent of the country’s total wealth to controlling more than 20 percent. This is the historical reality: Taxes on the "job creators," as they call themselves, have newer been lower in the U.S. Before Reagan, their marginal tax rate was 70 percent, while under Dwight D. Eisenhower, it was 91 percent. Today, it is 15 percent. Even so, no jobs are being created. Something is wrong with this picture. As the president said, it is math.
You can’t close the deficit solely through changes in education, health care and social benefits. A balance must be struck. And the "Buffett tax" (named after millionaire Warren Buffett, who supported its creation), accompanied by certain cuts, is a reasonable solution to the deficit that is in the minds of so many of us.
LOS ANGELES -- With the national unemployment rate at 9 percent and 46 million poor—one out of every six Americans or 15 percent, the highest percentage among industrialized countries—the United States must change the way it manages its economic policy. All of history’s great recessions have been overcome with deficit spending to create jobs. This one won’t be any different. Although the strategy does not seem to be working, consider this: A majority of economists said from the beginning that not only was there a need for a larger stimulus, but it was necessary to reform the tax code and ask millionaires and billionaires to contribute more.
President Obama presented a proposal addressing this, insisting people who make more than $1 million per year must pay the same tax rate as everyone else. Cries of "class warfare" are already being heard from populists who should be advocating for measures that benefit the country. In reality, they are defending the interests of the 1 percent of Americans who in the last 30 years have gone from owning 10 percent of the country’s total wealth to controlling more than 20 percent. This is the historical reality: Taxes on the "job creators," as they call themselves, have newer been lower in the U.S. Before Reagan, their marginal tax rate was 70 percent, while under Dwight D. Eisenhower, it was 91 percent. Today, it is 15 percent. Even so, no jobs are being created. Something is wrong with this picture. As the president said, it is math.
You can’t close the deficit solely through changes in education, health care and social benefits. A balance must be struck. And the "Buffett tax" (named after millionaire Warren Buffett, who supported its creation), accompanied by certain cuts, is a reasonable solution to the deficit that is in the minds of so many of us.
Disclaimer: Comments do not necessarily reflect the views of New America Media. NAM reserves the right to edit or delete comments. Once published, comments are visible to search engines and will remain in their archives. If you do not want your identity connected to comments on this site, please refrain from commenting or use a handle or alias instead of your real name.
Related Articles
La Opinión: Yes to "Buffett Tax"
Editors of La Opinión write that the United States must change the way it manages its…
The Math Behind “Class Warfare”--A Middle Class Under Attack
WASHINGTON--President Obama said on Monday that his proposal would bring taxes for millionaires in line…

Comments