Budget Cuts Threaten Health Care Access to California's Kids
Yesterday, Governor Jerry Brown and legislative leaders announced a budget deal that unnecessarily jeopardizes the health of California's children. The deal includes the administration’s original proposal to eliminate the Healthy Families Program, and shift nearly 900,000 childrenenrolled in it to Medi-Cal next year.
Given the state’s fiscal climate and sluggish economy, it’s clear that policymakers need to make difficult budget choices. But it is short-sighted to shift all of those children out of a popular and successful program, with no guarantee that they’ll actually be able to access the care they need in their new coverage. Finding timely medical care will especially be a challenge for children in rural areas, more so if they speak languages other than English. Getting dental care will be even more difficult.
It has long been a challenge to ensure that all children in Medi-Cal find an appropriate primary care provider or a specialist in their area and get an appointment in a timely fashion.So what will happen when hundreds of thousands of additional children also try to access the same care and providers?
As a state, we should be improving health coverage for the 4.5 million California children who currently rely on Medi-Cal and Healthy Families, not put them at risk by balancing the budget on their backs. Make no mistake. Such strategies will only create wider budget gaps in the future if kids aren’t able to get the preventive care they need to stay healthy and succeed in life.
That’s why health care providers and consumer advocates are extremely disappointed in this unprecedented and reckless budget decision. We think there are better choices that don’t risk children’s health: A coalition of more than 40 organizations have endorsed an alternative proposal that would have transitioned a smaller group of children and provided strong protections and safeguards to improve children’s access to care.
California needs to get its priorities straight. We should be putting children first and finding “pro-kid” budget solutions that invest in our children and their future.
Mike Odeh is a health policy advocate at Children Now in Oakland, Calif.
Posted Jun 24 2012
By reading "Penny Health" website I learnt In actuality, there are two programs at work here: States that chose to administer the plan themselves and states that opted out and asked the federal government to step in.
Disclaimer: Comments do not necessarily reflect the views of New America Media. NAM reserves the right to edit or delete comments. Once published, comments are visible to search engines and will remain in their archives. If you do not want your identity connected to comments on this site, please refrain from commenting or use a handle or alias instead of your real name.
Related Articles
Asthmatic Woman Believes LA’s Free Health Care Program is Keeping Her Alive
INGLEWOOD, Calif. - For years after she lost her job as a telephone operator…
The Tooth Gap for California’s Kids - It’s Widening
Over half of California’s children will soon have access to dental care because of the…
경기 불황, 가난하면 죽는것도 너무 비싸
영어 스페인어편집자주: 이 기사는 뉴어메리카미디어 ‘닥터스 워드’의 시리즈 칼럼이며, 경기 불황으로 가난한 사람들이 부닺치는 헬스케어의 벽과…
In the Great Recession, Even Death Is Too Expensive for the Poor
Traducción al español中文翻譯한국어Artwork by www.TommieKelly.comEditor's Note: This story was written for New America Media as…
The Challenge for Kids’ Health Insurance - Keeping Them Enrolled
When the breadwinner of a Hmong family in Merced, Calif., lost his employer-sponsored health insurance…
Koreans Hit by Cuts to Adult Day Care
LOS ANGELES -- Hyo-ju Han’s morning begins everyday at 6 a.m., when she rises out…

Comments