Richmond Residents Weigh In on Soda Tax
Editor's note: Richmond is now ground zero for the debate over how to reduce soda consumption, with a one-cent per-ounce tax increase to appear on the ballot in November. Residents are divided. Some contend the tax will contribute to lower rates of obesity, others that it is simply a means to raising revenue while hurting small business. National stakeholders, meanwhile, including the American Beverage Association and the American Medical Association, are channeling efforts toward winning over voters in this largely low-income city. The Pulse is going to track changing views over the next four months with regular updates on the issue. The following is a sampling of public opinion taken outside the Richmond library.
Vanessa Dilworth, 20: I think it’s a good idea because its going to put money back in the community. I would vote for it. I worked in a health food store and I stopped drinking soda because I know it’s bad for you. Water is best and juice. Organic stuff is good.
Bruce Lawerence, 50: “I hadn’t heard of it. It all depends on the funding and where the taxes are actually gonna go. If they’re gonna line the pockets of the city council and such, I’m not for that. But if it’s for what they say it’s for then it’s a good thing probably. I do drink soda and a couple pennies here and there ain’t gonna matter.
Unnamed, 72: “I’ve heard about the soda tax. It's just like they were going to do the cigarette tax. I’m a pipe smoker. It's just a way to get more revenue, it isn’t going to help anybody. I can go to El Cerrito and buy my sodas. I think it will hurt merchants here in Richmond.”
Beatrice Walker, Richmond Resident Since 1963: “Soda is not too good for people and it's making some people obese. It's not a pure kind of drink that people should be drinking. They should drink more healthy drinks. The addiction has a hook on you. It's hard to break the habit.The tax may stop some people but it won’t stop everyone. There should be more educational programs in order to encourage people not to drink the wrong thing.”
Philip Marin, 25: “It's not going to stop obesity, it’s just going to make people spend more money on sodas. People are not gonna switch to water. They would have to tax it more than a penny per ounce.”
Yolanda Vega, 30: “I’m actually against it. They are trying to do it to use the profits for obesity and stuff but it’s one of those taxes that’s really trying to mandate what we consume. It’s not something I would go for.”
Disclaimer: Comments do not necessarily reflect the views of New America Media. NAM reserves the right to edit or delete comments. Once published, comments are visible to search engines and will remain in their archives. If you do not want your identity connected to comments on this site, please refrain from commenting or use a handle or alias instead of your real name.
Related Articles
Field Poll: Ethnic Voters Support Soda Tax, Obesity Prevention
SAN FRANCISCO -- A majority of California voters support taxing sugar-sweetened beverages if those taxes…
Soda Tax Lost, But Richmond, Calif. Still Won (Sort of)
RICHMOND, Calif. – Billboards for No on Measure N, the controversial soda tax that voters…
Will Youth Bubble Up for Richmond, CA “Soda Tax” Vote Despite Industry Millions to Fizzle It?
RICHMOND, Calif. – Nai Saechao, a first time voter, says she hasn’t made up…
Soda Tax an ‘Opportunity to Change Richmond’s Destiny'
Ed. Note: Come November residents of Richmond, California will have a chance to weigh in…
What is PepsiCo Buying With Donations to Communities of Color?
When I heard recently that the National Association of Hispanic Journalists had accepted $100,000 from…
Richmond Residents Weigh In on Soda Tax
Editor's note: Richmond is now ground zero for the debate over how to reduce soda…

Comments