Loop21, News Report, Posted: Oct 02, 2012

 When Shelly from Indiana became pregnant, she was working two jobs. During the day, she packed items to ship for a medical supply company; overnight, she stocked shelves for a major national retail chain. When her doctor advised that she not lift more than 20 pounds, the retailer refused to modify her responsibilities. She miscarried shortly thereafter. When she became pregnant again months later and communicated the same restrictions, she was fired.

Stories like Shelly's have inspired the National Women’s Law Center to champion the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act, a bill that would make it illegal for employers to fire women who are unable to perform all their job duties due to their pregnancy, or who seek feasible workplace accommodations for the same reason.

In May, U.S. Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., introduced the bill in the House. Last week, it reached the Senate floor, where it has stalled with a 3 percent chance of being passed. With more than 100 co-sponsors, it's clear the bill strikes a chord, but with the presidential election less than two months away, the bill's somewhat divisive nature may discourage any urgency in getting it passed.
 
Carrie Hoffman is a labor and employment lawyer for Gardere Wynne Sewell, who represents companies not individual workers. Hoffman believes the sensitive nature of the bill will have it being left in limbo until after the election—if ever. Read more here.